Jaipur Literature Festival 2021: A virtual extravaganza of books, ideas and dialogue

You would recollect that last year – 2020, I had brought Jaipur Literature Fest Live from Jaipur, presenting day-by-day, event-by-event account. It would not be possible this year for obvious reasons, but Virtual Version is no less with its very impressive line up of authors and speakers. 

The second day of ‘the greatest literary show on Earth’ featured sessions on fiction, film, food, feminism, biography, theology & much more which included sessions featuring novels that unblinkingly examined inequity across Indian society, the extravagant journey of perhaps one of the greatest filmmakers Bollywood has seen, the life and writings of the master of words, Dante, on the 700th anniversary of his death, along with a session that brought together a cross-section of voices and perspectives to understand feminism and its kaleidoscopic dimensions.

Annie Zaidi and Deepa Anappara, in conversation with Shahnaz Habib, spoke about their writing process, their exploration of the fiction genre and the source of their inspirations. At the session, supported by The JCB Prize for Literature, the authors spoke about the liberty that writing fiction allowed and how it helped them bring difficult stories from marginalised communities to the fore, allowing them to showcase different points of view, without having to approach the subject from a journalistic lens. Prelude to a Riot by Annie Zaidi is the disturbing narrative of two families, and charts the growth of religious intolerance, while Deepa Anappara’s debut novel, Djinn Patrol on the Purple Line, tells a haunting tale of heartbreak and the loss of innocence.

Bestselling author Simon Winchester discussed his latest book Land: How the Hunger for Ownership Shaped the Modern World, which traces the concept of land and its ownership from an anthropological perspective. In conversation with Raghu Karnad, Winchester spoke about the “bloody” history of land ownership, which he attributed to “capitalistic thought” and its mythical idea of land that dictates that once you own it, it’s yours, mostly because land had the capacity to yield money. “Land is proving to be no longer immutable,” he said, “We’re losing it to global warming and climate change and it may be slow but it is very noticeable.” Unfair, oppressive and fascinating ideas such as ‘Terra nullius’ (Latin for nobody’s land) were brought to light. The conversation traced political, religious and technological feats and shone light on everything from the history of race to ecological plights and how humankind’s connection with land has been elemental, contentious and necessary.

The session “Of the People, For the People” featured former Chief Election Commissioner of India, Navin Chawla, former Chairman of the Election Commission of Sri Lanka, Mahinda Deshapriya, former Chief Election Commissioner of Bhutan, Dasho Kunzang Wangdi and Commissioner at the Election Commission of Nepal, Neel Kantha Uprety, in conversation with author Mukulika Banerjee. Together, they spoke about the process, achievements and challenges of the electoral process in their respective countries. Uprety talked about how the electoral system had played a big role in bringing the insurgents into the peace process in Nepal.

Deshapriya spoke of Sri Lanka being the first South Asian country to have gone through elections in the midst of a global pandemic. In response to a statement about many politicians having criminal records, Wangdi said that in Bhutan, candidates seeking election to the Parliament needed a university degree as well as a certificate that testified they did not have a criminal record. Chawla highlighted the sheer scale, the “secrecy of the ballot” and the quick delivery of results as among the strengths of an Indian Election. Another important aspect of the Indian system, he added, was that results had to be accepted by both losers and winners graciously.

“Conducting free and fair elections is the basic building block of any democracy. We took this process for granted until the US elections, where the transfer of power was not peaceful,” Banerjee commented.

The almost-mythical figures of the nationalist movement have always been surrounded by controversy and hold a revered status in the minds of many as they continue to influence the politics of today. Very rarely does a conversation revolving around the Partition not mention Nehru, Jinnah, and Gandhi; their political presence has played a key role in the formation of the modern-day understanding of India and Pakistan. Speaking at a session, Ishtiaq Ahmed, through his book ‘Jinnah: His Successes, Failures and Role in History’, aimed to debunk myths surrounding Pakistan’s Quaid-e-Azam. A well-known scholar of South Asian history and politics, Ahmed possesses an intricate understanding of partition studies, while his reliance on primary sources details his rigorous efforts to document true narratives.

Scholar and author Rupert Snell chatted with Harish Trivedi on his translation of the Bihari Satsai. Describing his long association with Biharilal’s compositions, Snell said that he was initially drawn to the playfulness of the poet’s language – the puns and alliterations attracted him to take on the translation. But he clarified that the book of his translation of the Satsai was only a “snapshot” of Bihari’s work and “not necessarily the final version”.

At a delightful session on feminism, writers Bee Rowlatt, Mariam Khan and Sabrina Mahfouz, shared their perspectives on feminism and why feminism in its present form must die to accommodate other versions of feminism. Rowlatt, who calls herself as a late emerging feminist, said that one could not get stuck to one idea of feminism and that feminism needed to be constantly reframed – I would compare feminism to a white shark that has to keep moving to get oxygen, otherwise it will die.” Mahfouz, however, was not quite hopeful if feminism within the framework of patriarchy and white supremacy could be challenged. “It is tough,” she said. In fact, she herself continues to struggle with multiple tags that people put on her identity. For example, people wonder how she is both a Muslim and a vegan!

Discussing prolific playwright and screenwriter Tom Stoppard, authors Chandrahas Choudhury and Hermione Lee uncovered many fascinating facts of Stoppard’s life. During the session supported by the Hawthornden Trust, Lee shared her feelings that through her writing she had found an artfulness that spoke to many different readers.

 

Skyrocketing Fuel Prices: Is it like robbing Peter to pay Paul?

The fuel prices in India have been consistently on the rise for the last few days, so much so, crossed century in many states. But this century did not cheer the Indian middle class, rather it has hit them hard.

After Pandemic Year 2020, when the economy opened in 2021 and people started moving out, fuel prices of cooking gas, CNG, Petrol, Diesel sent the family budget for a toss. The salary cut which was enforced during the pandemic has not been restored in many companies. So, salary stagnant, fuel prices dynamic, what an odd combination!Government, authorities, economists, media are busy explaining the scenario but it has not gone down with the Indian middle class. They want their fuel at reasonable rather rational prices so that they can afford it. It is none of their business that what is happening to fuel prices internationally. They are suffering as they have to cut corners. They are paying taxes on income, expenditure and fuel too. Why they should be taxed additionally? Why can’t fuel be under the ambit of GST, one nation, one tax, one fuel price?

No, because the Government has to drive its welfare programs and infrastructure development. Hence, the poor middle class will helplessly pay some obscene amount for a litre of petrol which he uses to go to the office, take children to school, buying grocery, hospital etc. Isn’t it like robbing Peter to pay Paul? It is like making vote banks happy to make the middle class suffer because they don’t raise their voice collectively. This is where the Indian middle class has failed themselves. They think individually, not collectively. If I can pay, why should I bother about my neighbour?

Government has their reasons to justify skyrocketing fuel prices like less fuel production by manufacturing countries to gain more profit and manufacturing countries are producing less fuel to gain more profit.

FM explained, fuel prices are controlled by Oil companies and we have very little say in the matter. Are Oil companies outside the ambit of the Government of India, which are majorly PSUs?

Another justification of the scenario is that the Centre and the States are doing various development work in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, for which they collect taxes, and these development projects generate jobs. Govt has increased its investment and 34 per cent more capital spending will be done in this budget. State governments will also increase spending. This is why they need to tax fuel.

But isn’t some balance required? One gets a job, others get robbed? There is a balance needed here.

The fuel prices in India have been consistently on the rise for the last few days, so much so, crossed century in many states. But this century did not cheer Indian middle class, rather it has hit them hard. After Pandemic Year 2020, when the economy opened in 2021 and people started moving out, fuel prices of cooking gas, CNG, Petrol, Diesel sent the family budget for a toss. The salary cut which was enforced during the pandemic has not been restored in many companies. So, salary stagnant, fuel prices dynamic, what an odd combination!

Government, authorities, economists, media are busy explaining the scenario but it has not gone down with the Indian middle class. They want their fuel at reasonable rather rational prices so that they can afford it. It is none of their business that what is happening to fuel prices internationally. They are suffering as they have to cut corners. They are paying taxes on income, expenditure and fuel too. Why they should be taxed additionally? Why can’t fuel be under the ambit of GST, one nation, one tax, one fuel price?

No, because the Government has to drive its welfare programs and infrastructure development. Hence, the poor middle class will helplessly pay some obscene amount for a litre of petrol which he uses to go to the office, take children to school, buying grocery, hospital etc. Isn’t it like robbing Peter to pay Paul? It is like making vote banks happy to make the middle class suffer because they don’t raise their voice collectively. This is where the Indian middle class has failed themselves. They think individually, not collectively. If I can pay, why should I bother about my neighbour?

Government has their reasons to justify skyrocketing fuel prices like less fuel production by manufacturing countries to gain more profit and manufacturing countries are producing less fuel to gain more profit.

FM explained, fuel prices are controlled by Oil companies and we have very little say in the matter. Are Oil companies outside the ambit of the Government of India, which are majorly PSUs?

Another justification of the scenario is that the Centre and the States are doing various development work in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, for which they collect taxes, and these development projects generate jobs. Govt has increased its investment and 34 per cent more capital spending will be done in this budget. State governments will also increase spending. This is why they need to tax fuel.

But isn’t some balance required? One gets a job, other gets robbed? There is a balance needed here.

Why the rise in fuel prices?

International oil prices have been on the rise since Saudi Arabia pledged additional voluntary output cuts of 1 million barrels per day under a deal between the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and its allies, OPEC+. Oil prices rose to USD 63 per barrel (highest in a year), since the deal.

The output cuts by global oil-producing nations are responsible for the rise in international fuel prices that have resulted in higher retail rates in India.

But the fact remains that price-sensitive Indian consumers are affected by rising petroleum product prices beyond measure and are suffering in silence.

Time is to need to unite and express displeasure at the scenario at least!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Time is to need to unite and express displeasure at the scenario at least!